
As part of the first activity of weeks 21/22 we were asked to read a chapter of Stepping over the edge:the implications of new technologies for education by Gráinne Conole.
This was an interesting read which I mostly agreed with.
Points included;
- The difficulty in trying to classify web 2.0 technologies as they don’t fit older classifications, they can be used for a wider range and functions and they can often be integrated with other web 2.0 systems which changes their purpose.
- Web 2.0 has led to a breakdown in boundries eg in applications ( google docs; word processing or wiki?) in individuals and communities (blogs/ social networks) and the roles of teachers and students.
Also particular issues for learning providers in a web 2.0 world
- What is the role of systems provided by a learning provider when other, ofren superior systems are freely available to students (eg email)
- What are the quality, copyright and privacy issues related to user generated content?
- Learners (and staff) not having the digital literate skills required to find filter and interprite information from such a wide range of sources
- Do students learn more now through experiential interaction than guided steps?
- Teachers have changed alo less than students with a small number of exceptions
- Teachers lack the time and incentive to explore new technologies
- The notion that teacher is expert and student is a receiver of information is out of date.
- “To label it as a generational effect is too simplistic”
- Academics often fail to see the benifits of web 2.0
- Teachers can not be shown the benifits of web 2.0, they need to be useing it and emerserd in it to fully grasp its potential.
- As the role of the teacher/ learning provider changes, what is it the student is actually paying for?



1 response so far ↓
Sheeran Zsigo // July 17, 2009 at 11:12 am |
Kevin,
I too agreed with most of Conole’s points and havin read your blog am thinking that the one point I hadn’t recorded on mine was the notion of what are students paying for? Given that I have considered the changing roles and the distribution of learning – a very valid point is if we aren’t able to say who is the learner and who is the teacher – then why pay and for what is it reasonable to still pay?